• July 21, 2024



Have a great weekend Deplorables!

If the Resistance Wins: If the Resistance wins, the future of America comes down to a stark choice in 2020. https://t.co/AWRnzE0rMe

— American Thinker (@amthinker) November 16, 2019

If the Resistance Wins

Via The American Thinker

In early May 2017, Hillary Clinton declared herself “an activist citizen and part of what she called The Resistance. Later that month, May 17, 2017, she officially launched a “political organization aimed at funding ‘resistance’ groups” to oppose and undermine the president. As early as June 2, 2016, Hillary had been questioning President Trump’s “fitness to lead” and given a “tour-de-force assault on his record,” calling him “too dangerous and unstable” to be president. She has spent the past three years declaring herself the real winner of the 2016 election and attacking the president’s fitness for office. Looking at her pitiful illusions in multiple interviews, her recent book, and her desperate quest for the presidency, it’s not hard to guess what drives her compulsion to lead what she calls “The Resistance.”

Various other Democrats­ — Elizabeth Warren, Ben Cardin, Dick Durbin, Maxine Waters, and others — began talking (December 2016), and haven’t stopped since, about undoing the results of the election, actually using the word “impeachment,” before the inauguration. Vanity Fair asked shortly after the election, “Will Trump Be Impeached?,” and Politico in April asked how soon impeachment could take place. This unprecedented resistance-impeachment movement gained full-bore momentum when House speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that Democrats would impeach Trump because we “can’t let him ‘win’ reelection.” It became obvious that the fear of Trump’s re-election was driving the 79-year-old speaker’s risky and questionable strategy.

The impeachment circus on the Hill, led by the shifty Rep. Adam B. Schiff, is nothing more than a last-ditch effort by The Resistance to have the media declare their do-over efforts a “win” with what they hope will be a knock-out victory. They are putting America through this “show trial” so the Democrats with the help of their media allies can, at least, wound Trump sufficiently among enough ill informed sound-bite voters to enable them to “win” the election they lost in 2016.

In addition to the lost productivity of a House devoting all its energy and time to undermining the president, what else is at stake when a major political party refuses to accept the results of an election and devotes itself exclusively to “resistance” instead? Much has been written about the sham of the Schiff-style impeachment. Among the best assessments are those provided by Victor Davis Hanson, who gives ten compelling reasons why impeachment is illegitimate and another ten reasons why impeachment is really a coup.

An often overlooked question is what happens after this circus is over. Clearly, the Democrats have control of the House, and they can impeach, as they obviously are determined to do. So what’s next? After the “victory,” what are the spoils? Aside from retaining her tenuous grasp on power a short while longer, what can Pelosi at her age hope to accomplish if her frantic attempts to tarnish Trump succeed enough that he fails to win re-election, thereby protecting her momentarily from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the rest of the radicals on one side and the ambitious Schiff on the other?

Read the entire article HERE.

Was John Brennan coup leader?https://t.co/W7Uis03kaN

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) November 16, 2019

he Brennan Dossier: All About a Prime Mover of Russiagate

Via Real Clear Investigations

In the waning days of the Obama administration, the U.S. intelligence community produced a report saying Russian President Vladimir Putin had tried to swing the 2016 election to Donald Trump.

The January 2017 report, called an Intelligence Community Assessment, followed months of leaks to the media that had falsely suggested illicit ties between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin while also revealing that such contacts were the subject of a federal investigation. Its release cast a pall of suspicion over Trump just days before he took office, setting the tone for the unfounded allegations of conspiracy and treason that have engulfed his first term.

The ICA’s blockbuster finding was presented to the public as the consensus view of the nation’s intelligence community. As events have unfolded, however, it now seems apparent that the report was largely the work of one agency, the CIA, and overseen by one man, then-Director John Brennan, who closely directed its drafting and publication with a small group of hand-picked analysts.
Nearly three years later, as the public awaits answers from two Justice Department inquiries into the Trump-Russia probe’s origins, and as impeachment hearings catalyzed by a Brennan-hired anti-Trump CIA analyst unfold in Congress, it is clear that Brennan’s role in propagating the collusion narrative went far beyond his work on the ICA. A close review of facts that have slowly come to light reveals that he was a central architect and promoter of the conspiracy theory from its inception. The record shows that…
Read the entire article HERE.

Thaddeus G. McCotter: What do all three of these ideologies have in common? Their inherently evil impact upon those who disagree and dissent. https://t.co/TpSP5OmHGz

— American Greatness (@theamgreatness) November 16, 2019

The Left’s Unholy Trinity of Ideologies

Via American Greatness

What do all three of these ideologies have in common? Their inherently evil impact upon those who disagree and dissent.

y late father rarely gave me advice, so when he did, I listened. One of those times was especially memorable and has always stuck with me. He advised me always to understand the roots and consequences of your own and others’ political views, so you can properly espouse or, if need be, oppose them. It was not unexpected advice from a public school teacher.

Consequently, in 1977, when I was 12, he began an intermittent process of handing me the three books he felt I needed to read, prefacing each book loan with the phrase, “Know your enemy.”

The three books were John Toland’s Adolf Hitler, Marx and Engels’ The Communist Manifesto, and Alfred Steinberg’s The Bosses, about corrupt Democrat and Republican urban political machines in early 20th-century America. The enemies? These three insidious ideologies threatening our free republic: fascism/racism, socialism/Communism, and “bossism.”

Though my father was a staunch Democrat and a union man, none of the three books tendered for my edification were intended to proselytize me into embracing the Democrats by bashing or otherwise denigrating the Republican Party. No, my father—who never doubted America is the greatest nation on earth—understood as most Americans did at the time that both of America’s two major political parties could agree on this basic truth, and at the same time differ on how best to forge a more perfect union.

What my father was endeavoring to impart to me was the simple truth that the United States of America’s revolutionary experiment in liberty and self-government is always the target of dictators, tyrants, terrorists, and barbarous regimes bent upon subordinating the people to the state; and the three books were provided for my edification to know and fight these enemies of human freedom and America.

Read the entire article HERE.

Soros and his NGOs have essentially taken over the operations of the U.S. government in Ukraine https://t.co/kIPu4n92IF

— The Hammer (@Jim_Peoples_) November 15, 2019

George Soros – The God Emperor Of Ukraine

Via CD Media

Soros Runs US Government In Ukraine, Not President Trump

With the ‘impeachment’ inquiry underway in the U.S. House of Representatives, any reasonable person will see the lineup of U.S. government officials arrayed against POTUS for disagreeing with them on American foreign policy. Impeachment is not just about removing President Trump from office, or to prevent his re-election, it is about securing future control over American operations in foreign countries by the progressive Deep State that was established under the Obama Administration.

These people have become drunk on power and on lot’s of your money; they don’t want this gravy train to stop.

Soros and his NGOs have essentially taken over the operations of the U.S. government in Ukraine. Open Society or Aspen Institute people have been placed strategically in positions of power throughout the Department of State, CIA, FBI, USAID, and other American governmental instruments. Soros NGOs like the Open Society Institute, the Aspen Institute, and the International Renaissance Foundation train a pipeline of cadre that when experienced enough are placed in the appropriate positions of power.

This also happens on the Ukrainian side. Soros-influenced personnel are located throughout the Ukrainian government, and penetrate every ministry in the country. These strategic tactics were honed by the Soros infrastructure in the Balkans and also in Central Europe.

These well-placed Soros agents make sure any decisions regarding commercial banks, sale of land, decentralization, minority benefits, etc, are all decided in favor of the progressive agenda. This process leads to the loss of sovereignty and the economic plunder of Ukraine. Much of the billions in aid given by the U.S. government and the International Monetary Fund are in turn given to Soros NGOs in-country in order to further the Soros plan. These developments have led to looting, laundering of money, breakdown of government institutions, bankruptcies and the fire-sale of government-owned institutions in Ukraine.

Read the entire article HERE.

Globalists Openly Admit To Population Control Agenda – And That’s A Bad Sign… https://t.co/LJ0NmIQ4cn

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) November 16, 2019

Globalists Openly Admit To Population Control Agenda – And That’s A Bad Sign…

Via Zero Hedge

In 2019, the population agenda is being ramped into high gear and the public is being carefully conditioned over time to accept the idea that man-made climate change is real and population is the source of the problem. Recently, a groups of scientists partially funded by something called the “Worthy Garden Club” claimed 11,000 signatures on a statement for the need for population reduction in the name of saving the Earth from global warming.

The statement cites all the same long debunked IPCC and UN climate change propaganda as the reasons why the Earth is on the verge of annihilation. The fact of the matter is, climate scientists have been consistently caught red handed manipulating their own data to show the intended outcome of global warming. They have even been caught trying to adjust their own data from 20 years ago in order to match it more closely to the rigged data they publish today.

The Worthy Garden Club is a strangely sterile group and there doesn’t seem to be any list of their patrons and who funds them. However, the mainstream media was quick to pick up on the statement from the “11,000 scientists” and tie it to statements made by the UN’s IPCC.

Population control has also been brought up consistently as an issue in the 2020 Presidential Election race. Bernie Sanders argued for birth control measures in poor countries. Elizabeth Warren promoted abortion by saying it was as safe as “getting your tonsils removed”. She has consistently promoted the carbon control agenda of the UN and was, interestingly, a member of the University Of Texas Population research Center in the 1980s. And, Green New Deal politicians are throwing their support behind the statements from the Worthy Garden Club on population reduction.

This is the first time I have seen the argument for population reduction used so blatantly and widespread in the mainstream media, and it suggests to me that a trend is forming. For years I have warned my readers that they will know when the globalists are about to pull the plug on the current system when they start talking about their criminality openly. When they admit to their agenda in a free way, this means they are close to a global reset and do not care anymore who knows about it. The openness of the plan to cut world population is becoming apparent.

Strangely, there has been little mention of the fact that the world population, in the west most of all, is actually in decline. Far from exploding beyond the Earth’s capacity, people are barely having enough children to keep the current population stable. It would appear that the globalist agenda is already in motion. Through engineered economic disintegration, the population is being slowly reduced. However, this slow decline may not be enough to satisfy the globalists.

How many people would the globalists like to kill off to achieve their utopian aspirations? Well, globalist Ted Turner in a moment of honesty said when confronted by We Are Change that the population should be reduced to 2 billion down from 7 billion.

The primary issue here beyond the moral horror show of eugenics is, who gets cut? And furthermore, who gets to decide who gets cut?

Read the entire article HERE.

Fashion writers from @washingtonpost and @nytimes are added to impeachment coverage to laud fashions of the Democrat witnesses, and trash Jim Jordan for not wearing a jacket. The bias knows no bounds. https://t.co/8m3h9qUUBe

— NewsBusters (@newsbusters) November 16, 2019

WashPost Slams Jacketless Jim Jordan, New York Times Oozes Over ‘Bow Tie of History’

Via Newsbusters

Washington Post fashion critic Robin Givhan offered her classic take as a frustrated liberal editorial writer on the first public impeachment hearing in the House on Wednesday. The headline in the paper was “Be a sport, Jim Jordan, and put on a jacket.” Online it was “For dignity’s sake, Jim Jordan, put on a jacket.”

Givhan lectured that the conservative from Ohio was somehow betraying the Constitution in shirt sleeves:

Everyone else was willing to offer at least a symbolic nod to decorous formality, to that old-fashioned notion of civility. Jordan announced himself as the man who was itching to rumble. He was the guy who came not to do as the Constitution demands with measured deliberation but to brawl.

The Democratic witnesses, on the other hand, were completely appropriate:

George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary of state, wore a three-piece suit, no less. He paired it with a genial bow tie and an expression of bemused patience when questioning veered off road. His right eyebrow, with its rise and fall, was a soliloquy on professorial forbearance. Acting ambassador William B. Taylor Jr. was also duly attired in a suit, with a green four-in-hand — his brow furrowing with his efforts to sort the questions from the chaff.

But Jordan, in his role as a representative of the American people, couldn’t be bothered to suit up.

This is the same Givhan who has ruled her queen Michelle Obama can “wear whatever she likes.” 

Read the entire article HERE.

Hillary Clinton Receives Large Cash Advance For ‘What Happened 2’ Ahead Of 2020 Presidential Run https://t.co/TseeCTWOfr

— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) November 15, 2019

Hillary Clinton Receives Large Cash Advance For ‘What Happened 2’ Ahead Of 2020 Presidential Run

Via The Babylon Bee (Satire)

WASHINGTON, D.C.—According to sources close to the Clinton camp, Hillary has already received a large cash advance for a book to explain the imminent failure of her 2020 campaign.

What Happened 2 will explore all the reasons Hillary Clinton lost the 2020 race, from Russian hackers and ignorant bigots to extraterrestrials and global warming.

“If you didn’t get enough of Hillary blaming her 2016 failure on everyone except herself in the first book, you’ll love What Happened 2,” said a press release from the book’s publisher, Simon & Schuster. “The chapter in which Hillary will blame the electoral college will be particularly interesting, as will the lengthy appendix listing over 4,500 scapegoats for her upcoming loss.”

Clinton’s take was estimated at over $5 million for the much-anticipated sequel.

The publisher also insisted they were not under any kind of duress when they gave Clinton the cash. “We want to reiterate that we are publishing this book entirely of our own volition, and we were not threatened by the Clintons in any way.”

Check out all of the Bee’s hilarious takes on politics and culture HERE.

Be sure to subscribe to Def-Con News to get Breakfast For The Brain in your morning mailbox.


Share on:
Freedom vs Tyranny

Don Marten