Larry Elder -December 29th, 2022
Stanford University put out a new list of words it considers to be “harmful language.” The 13-page “Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative” includes words like “immigrant,” which should be replaced by “person who has immigrated.” It advises against saying “walk-in hours” in favor of “open hours” to avoid discriminating against and hurting the feeling of those with disabilities. Stanford urges that we drop the phrase “beating a dead horse” because it normalizes violence against animals.
Under a section called “Imprecise Language,” the guide suggests replacing the term “American” with “U.S. citizen.” It explains: “(‘American’) often refers to people from the United States only, thereby insinuating that the US is the most important country in the Americas.” After all, North and South America contain 42 countries. And they have feelings, too.
Goodness, one of my favorite groups growing up was “Jay and the Americans.” One can never listen to “Cara Mia” the same way again. What about calling someone “un-American”? Is that elitist, too? Can we still refer to a style as “Americana”?
Do we have to dump the term “the United States of America” in favor of “the United States of One of the 42 Countries in the Americas”? In baseball, we have the National League and, goodness, the American League. Bye-bye, “American Dream,” “All American,” “All-American Girl,” “American Idol,” “American exceptionalism,” “American Express,” “AmWay” and certainly the expression “the American way.” Sorry, Superman, and the “never-ending battle for truth, justice and the American way.”
But there is good news. This means we can drop that stupid, nonsensical, bizarre term “African American.” When a black person from the U.S. visits Africa, Africans do not refer to him or her as “African American.” I asked a reporter with The Los Angeles Times why in one paragraph the newspaper used the term “African-American” to describe a black man, and then in the same paragraph, near the end, described him as “black.” “What?” I said. “You don’t want your readers to get bored, so you switch it up?” I asked him where he was born. He said, “California.” I said, “Where are your parents from?” He said, “California.” To which I said, “Where are your parents’ parents from?” He said, “Russia.”
I asked, “Why aren’t you a ‘Russian-American’? I assure you that my ancestors have been in this country longer than yours. Yet, I have a hyphen when you describe me, but you don’t when I describe you?”
OK, Stanford, here are some suggestions for your next edition. Instead of “smash-and-grab robbery,” let’s use the word “reparations.” Instead of the term “Left-wing bigotry,” like the Hispanic Los Angeles City Council members and the Hispanic Los Angeles County union leader, the ones caught on tape making racist and disparaging remarks about blacks, a Jew, whites and Mexicans. Let’s just call this “Russian disinformation” to get them off the hook. A store thief is an “undocumented shopper.” Under your section of imprecise language, advise against saying “black, American conservative,” and instead use the term “Uncle Tom.” (Be honest — we know that’s what you think.) Southern border crossers are “uninvited guests.” Jew hatred is “thoughtful disagreement.” A serial killer is a “rogue mortician.”
But there is good news. After Stanford put out its language guide, the university immediately became the object of attack and ridicule. It now says the language guide is under review. The school recently issued the following statement: “We have particularly heard concerns about the guide’s treatment of the term ‘American.’ We understand and appreciate those concerns. To be very clear, not only is the use of the term ‘American’ not banned at Stanford, it is absolutely welcomed” (quote emphasized in the original).
Care to know what it costs to go to Stanford and learn stuff like this? Student expenses for 2022-2023: Tuition $57,693; Room and Board $18,619; Student Fees Allowance $2,145; and Books and Supplies Allowance $1,350. That’s a total of $79,807, and doesn’t include any document fees, new student orientation fees, personal expenses or travel expenses.
Instead of using the word “outrageous,” let’s call it “elevated pricing.”
It should be obvious that the media have abandoned all pretense of objectivity and become an unapologetic ad agency for the progressive movement – one that infuses left-wing talking points into every issue, from the economic collapse to the energy crisis.
They’re not even trying to get it right anymore.
But we at MRC’s NewsBusters are doing it right. We analyze the media as the threat to democracy they have become and expose the tools of their trade – deceit, bias, omission, and manipulation.
When Joy Reid says we care about Ukraine only because its people are “White” and “Christian,” it’s NewsBusters that lets you know. When CBS claims it’s not Joe Biden’s fault energy prices have doubled, it’s NewsBusters that calls them out on it.
It’s NewsBusters vs. the mainstream media Goliath. The great equalizer? You.
The support of our spirited and patriotic audience gives us the strength to take down giants. Please consider a donation today. Your $25 a month goes a long way in the fight for free and fair media.
– The NewsBusters Team