Terrorist Boston Marathon Bomber Has Sentence Reduced Due to Jury Bias But Judge Amy Berman Jackson Ignored Same Jury Bias in Roger Stone Case

 Terrorist Boston Marathon Bomber Has Sentence Reduced Due to Jury Bias But Judge Amy Berman Jackson Ignored Same Jury Bias in Roger Stone Case

The Boston Marathon Bomber had his sentence reduced last week due to jury bias.  He is no longer on death row.  Roger Stone’s jury was biased even worse, but corrupt Judge Amy Berman Jackson did nothing.  In today’s justice system terrorists have more rights than friends of President Trump.

This past week it was reported that the Boston Marathon bomber had his life sentence reduced due to jury bias in his case per Boston.com:

A federal appeals court Friday threw out Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s death sentence in the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, saying the judge who oversaw the case did not adequately screen jurors for potential biases.

A three-judge panel of the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered a new penalty-phase trial on whether the 27-year-old Tsarnaev should be executed for the attack that killed three people and wounded more than 260 others.

“But make no mistake: Dzhokhar will spend his remaining days locked up in prison, with the only matter remaining being whether he will die by execution,” Judge O. Rogeriee Thompson wrote in the ruling, more than six months after arguments were heard in the case.

Roger Stone complained about jury bias in his case and his judge, Amy Berman Jackson, praised the jurors.  Then Stone asked that she recuse herself based on her comments and she refused.  We reported this in February this year:

Roger Stone filed a motion Friday night asking Judge Amy Berman Jackson to recuse herself from his case after she praised the “integrity” of the jury that convicted him when she pronounced his sentence of 40 months in prison on Thursday even though she had Stone’s motion for a new trial based on juror bias pending in front of her. Stone was convicted in the Mueller probe last year on seven charges of lying to Congress, obstruction and witness tampering.

In the motion for recusal, Stone calls out Jackson for saying during the sentencing hearing, “Sure, the defense is free to say: So what? Who cares? But, I’ll say this: Congress cared. The United States Department of Justice and the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia that prosecuted the case and is still prosecuting the case cared. The jurors who served with integrity under difficult circumstances cared. The American people cared. And I care.”

Stone’s motion for a new trial was filed under seal, however the recusal motion indicates it is about

Source: The Gateway Pundit

cruznewslive

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This