July 31, 2023
Today we look into the curious ways that far-left leaning Democrats are protected FROM justice.
While anyone ever associated with President Trump and his administration are being regularly told to leave their banks, the Bidens are protected by these same banks after suspicious banking behavior.
While attorneys who have represented President Trump are having their law licenses challenged by numerous state bar associations, threatening their ability to earn a living, Hunter Biden blithely slips under professional scrutiny.
While callous irresponsible people in upper management make horrendously poor decisions, they are not held accountable. It is the people who work in the plants and drive the trucks who get laid off.
While normal, clear-thinking Americans recognize that Democrats cheat in elections, those who could make changes, don’t.
Read more about these issues below.
To sign up for a PAID Subscription GO HERE.
1- Across the world, those with opinions and actions that run afoul of the globalist elites, a.k.a. Democrats, are without warning, being thrown out of their banks.
But somehow, multiple large banks filed 170 suspicious reports on numerous Biden bank accounts and the Bidens have not been DE-BANKED!
These reports are sparingly issued by banks when they detect activity that may be criminal.
The reports are not proof of a crime but banks are familiar with what massive financial crime looks like. The Biden Crime Family appears to have committed racketeering, money laundering, wire fraud, tax evasion, bribery and corruption…to name just a few crimes that would land any Republican in jail.
QUOTE: As the evidence for at least an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden keeps pouring in, our friends at Twitchy highlighted another example: the suspicious activity reports (SARs) from six banks, to the tune of 170, in fact. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and co-host Ben Ferguson discussed these reports on their podcast with House Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-KY) as their guest. Not only has Comer been looking into the Biden family as part of fulfilling promises to the American people, he already is familiar with SARs, since, as he told Cruz, he was the director of a bank.
These SARs are submitted and sent to the Treasury Department when banks “have a strong suspicion” that a crime has been committed, so as to protect the bank. As Comer emphasized, these are submitted “very seldom.” If someone were to have two, the chairman explained, it would be hard for that person to open up a bank account. Submitting an SAR, Comer added, also is “inviting the regulators to come in and regulate,” which is the last thing banks want. The 170 reports are thus quite significant.
The allegations are certainly damning.
These were Banks which Cruz reminded were big, well-known banks who had lawyers who knew what they were doing, and knew that the Bidens were “politically exposed.” As Comer explained, the banks “suspected some of these wires were coming from state owned entities.” Cruz confirmed that means “the Chinese Communist government was sending the money.” The banks serve as the whistleblowers then, with Cruz and Comer confirming the banks are headed by Democrats, “reliable political donors to the Democrats,” as Cruz reminded.
In addition, credible IRS whistleblowers have accused the Justice Department of obstructing the Hunter Biden investigation by blocking felony charges, search warrants, and interviews while preventing any investigation of the President and his family.
“If they’re proven to be true, he should be impeached,” Cruz said. “He should be prosecuted, and he should go to jail. I will say this: the evidence keeps mounting up, and every day it looks worse and worse and worse for Joe Biden’s direct culpability in official corruption,” the senator added.
If the allegations turn out to be true, Cruz thinks Biden should be impeached for bribery, as well as prosecuted and jailed.
2- Attorneys with spotless professional records are being hounded by state bar associations and threatened with disbarment while this reprobate can be in “good standing” with his fellow attorneys.
QUOTE: Hunter Biden remains a member of the District of Columbia Bar in “good standing,” though he appears to have violated the rules of professional conduct in multiple ways.
During the Wednesday hearing on his plea deal for two misdemeanor tax crimes and diversion agreement for a felony gun charge, Hunter Biden told the judge he was a member of the D.C. and Connecticut bars. The D.C. Bar’s website confirms Biden is an active member, though the rules of professional conduct state in Rule 8.4(b) that it is misconduct for a lawyer to “commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects.”
“Many kinds of illegal conduct reflect adversely on fitness to practice law, such as offenses involving fraud and the offense of willful failure to file an income tax return,” the rules explain.
Under Rule XI on disciplinary proceedings, attorneys who display an addiction “to drugs or intoxicants” risk the “possibility of probationary conditions.” As the written plea deal obtained by Politico states, the president’s son “has a well-documented and long-standing struggle with substance abuse.”
Hunter Biden appears to be in violation of Rule 8.4(e), which explains it is misconduct to “state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official.”
3- As usual, it is the little guy who gets punched. We are sorry that hard working people in the trucks and the plants that get beer to the consumer are soon to be out of work.
The truth is, the entire elite educated, leftist upper management should be the ones being laid off.
On one hand, we appreciate the collective ability of regular, sane people to bring down a 140 year old brand in a few months. On the other hand, we are praying for those who rely on their Anheuser Busch jobs to support families.
QUOTE: After losing 12% of stock value, $16 billion in company worth, more than 25% of sales and dropping out of the #1 position for beer in the USA, Anheuser Busch CEO Brendan Whitworth finally announced, “Today we took the very difficult but necessary decision to eliminate a number of positions across our corporate organization.”
None of this was accidental or unforeseeable. Factually, former Budweiser Light Vice President of Marketing, Alissa Heinerscheid, told Anheuser Bush executives exactly what they were getting when they hired the Wharton business school graduate. Her intent was to bring a new cultural wokeism into the company, and the cultural wokeism is exactly what the company wanted.
The Anheuser Busch CEO and Board of Directors created the space for Heinerscheid to operate, approved of every move, gleefully celebrated the intent and purpose, and yet now stand back jaw-agape at the outcome? The time for pearl clutching, and reactionary perspectives is in the rear-view mirror. Do you really think the same CEO who approved the Heinerscheid agenda is really capable of removing the Heinerscheid culture?
Stop pretending. A generational collapse of a once heralded brand is complete. No one is going to touch Budweiser and the brand is permanently destroyed.
According to a letter sent to employees, laid-off staff will receive severance pay, six months of continued company-paid health insurance benefits and resources to help find a new job.
The Ardagh Group, a global glass producer who contracts with the Anheuser-Busch company, recently announced that it will be closing its plants in North Carolina and Louisiana in July, putting roughly 645 employees out of a job.
4- We always say that the only way to solve a problem is to be honest about why it is a problem. John Droz dives in to the election basics that are vital to get different results in 2024.
QUOTE: Like a train coming down the tracks of a tunnel we are in, the 2024 national elections are daily looming ever LARGER.
The only ways of avoiding the 2020 results are to: a) accurately determine what happened in 2020, and b) take timely and effective measures to see that it won’t be repeated in 2024.
There are all sorts of theories as to how the Democrats won the 2020 Presidential (and some congressional seats). On closer analysis, they boil down to two main conjectures:
1 – the Dems worked harder and smarter than the R’s, and/or
2 – they cheated.
The answer is almost certainly a combination of both. That leads to the extremely important question of how much of each: 50/50? 60/40? 90/10?
We MUST know that answer as it will determine the time, effort, and money we invest to respond. For example, if the results were 90% due to #1 and 10% to #2, that says our focus should be on how to work harder and smarter.
The problem here is that there is no way to definitively know the answer without meaningful (forensic) post-election audits in key states. This is one of the main reasons why the Left has resisted such audits. The disturbing reality is that zero states have meaningful (forensic) post-election audits! None. Nada.
So how do we decide how Dems won in 2020? I propose that we look at some of the evidence for each of the two main theories presented, and decide which is stronger.
Pray. Know. Share.
Defending The Republic
To SHARE with a friend – SEND THEM THIS LINK
Questions – or for a Free Subscription to This Newsletter? Contact: [email protected]
To Unsubscribe: Contact [email protected] with UNLIST in the Subject.
Subscribe to Defending The Republic
Newsletter analysis and summary of current social/political news